Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Trademark infringement - Use of confusingly similar mark - Though the plaintiff needn’t prove actual damages suffered by him, it is imperative that the Court while awarding damages considers the averments made in the plaint coupled with an assessment of the extent of damage likely caused or to be caused. - HC
Trademark infringement - Use of confusingly similar mark - Though the plaintiff needn’t prove actual damages suffered by him, it is imperative that the Court while awarding damages considers the averments made in the plaint coupled with an assessment of the extent of damage likely caused or to be caused. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.