<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Must Evaluate Likely Damage in Trademark Infringement Cases, Not Just Actual Damages, for Fair Compensation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16799</link>
    <description>Trademark infringement - Use of confusingly similar mark - Though the plaintiff needn’t prove actual damages suffered by him, it is imperative that the Court while awarding damages considers the averments made in the plaint coupled with an assessment of the extent of damage likely caused or to be caused. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:02:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:02:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=342762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Must Evaluate Likely Damage in Trademark Infringement Cases, Not Just Actual Damages, for Fair Compensation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16799</link>
      <description>Trademark infringement - Use of confusingly similar mark - Though the plaintiff needn’t prove actual damages suffered by him, it is imperative that the Court while awarding damages considers the averments made in the plaint coupled with an assessment of the extent of damage likely caused or to be caused. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:02:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=16799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>