Case ID : 13728
Penalty u/s 116 – There was no requirement of proving mens rea o...
Section 116 Penalty Focuses on Violation, Not Intent; Simplifies Enforcement by Emphasizing Actions Over Mental State. Note
Bookmark
Share
Print
Print Options Line Height: 1.1 1.2 Default (1.3) 1.5 2 Font Size: Extra Small Small Default Large Extra Large Margins: Narrow Default Wide Print: Head Note + Full Text Summary + Full Text Only Full Text Cancel Print / Download
Save Mark Clear This Mark Clear All Marks & Save
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on Go Back Done Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail
Customs August 5, 2013 Case Laws CGOVT
Penalty u/s 116 – There was no requirement of proving mens rea on the part of person-in-charge of conveyance - CGOVT
Penalty u/s 116 – There was no requirement of proving mens rea on the part of person-in-charge of conveyance - CGOVT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.