Brokerage commission benchmarking and investment advisory comparability depend on functional differences, economic circumstances and the services prov...
Proceeds of crime generated by activity relating to a scheduled offence may be provisionally attached even when held by a person not accused of that offence. A money-laundering investigation may trace such proceeds beyond the specific allegations in an FIR without investigating a different scheduled offence. Reasons to believe for attachment must be independently recorded on contemporaneous material; a later complaint relying on the same material does not supply improved grounds. A payment aggregator's failure to conduct due diligence on receipts from persons involved in cheating may undermine its claim of lack of knowledge. The reverse burden of proof applies only after foundational facts making out a money-laundering case are established; a vague claim that funds represent pooled legitimate receipts does not explain their sources.
Proceeds of crime generated by activity relating to a scheduled offence may be provisionally attached even when held by a person not accused of that offence. A money-laundering investigation may trace such proceeds beyond the specific allegations in an FIR without investigating a different scheduled offence. Reasons to believe for attachment must be independently recorded on contemporaneous material; a later complaint relying on the same material does not supply improved grounds. A payment aggregator's failure to conduct due diligence on receipts from persons involved in cheating may undermine its claim of lack of knowledge. The reverse burden of proof applies only after foundational facts making out a money-laundering case are established; a vague claim that funds represent pooled legitimate receipts does not explain their sources.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Get Daily Updates 
