Brand promotion expenditure requires an established associated-enterprise arrangement for transfer pricing, while management cross-charges must accoun...
Reassessment after the ordinary limitation period requires the escaped-income threshold and independent sanction, without expanding jurisdiction throu...
Transfer pricing comparability requires turnover and functional analysis, alongside rules on exempt-income disallowance and amalgamation goodwill depr...
Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002...
Direct appeals against provisional attachment under money laundering law fall outside appellate jurisdiction, which covers adjudicating authority orders.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 permits appeals against orders of the Adjudicating Authority, not direct appeals against provisional attachment orders. Provisional attachments are subject to adjudication under Sections 5 and 8. A direction to treat a writ petition as an appeal requires consideration according to law and does not remove statutory limits on appellate jurisdiction. A tribunal cannot exercise powers contrary to a statutory provision that has not been struck down.
Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 permits appeals against orders of the Adjudicating Authority, not direct appeals against provisional attachment orders. Provisional attachments are subject to adjudication under Sections 5 and 8. A direction to treat a writ petition as an appeal requires consideration according to law and does not remove statutory limits on appellate jurisdiction. A tribunal cannot exercise powers contrary to a statutory provision that has not been struck down.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Get Daily Updates 
