Cross-border secondment reimbursements require separate employment and knowledge-transfer analysis before taxation as included services under the Indi...
Customs procedure uniformity requires adoption of model clearance practices, subject to specific local requirements and infrastructure or geographical...
Inspection of goods in transit is distinct from penal jurisdiction under section 129. Where documented interstate goods merely pass through a State without a tax incidence there, its authorities cannot seize them or impose a penalty under that provision; documentary deficiencies may instead be reported to the GST authorities in the origin or destination State. Such seizure and penalties infringe freedom of trade and commerce under Article 301. Section 129 addresses deliberate tax evasion, not a revenue-neutral invoice timing mismatch between distinct registrations of the same business when valid tax invoices and e-way bills cover the movement.
Inspection of goods in transit is distinct from penal jurisdiction under section 129. Where documented interstate goods merely pass through a State without a tax incidence there, its authorities cannot seize them or impose a penalty under that provision; documentary deficiencies may instead be reported to the GST authorities in the origin or destination State. Such seizure and penalties infringe freedom of trade and commerce under Article 301. Section 129 addresses deliberate tax evasion, not a revenue-neutral invoice timing mismatch between distinct registrations of the same business when valid tax invoices and e-way bills cover the movement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.