Stock-in-trade transfer taxability follows possession and consideration, not later conveyance registration, limiting deemed-value provisions to the ac...
Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Jurisdictional satisfaction for penalty under section 271(1)(c) must be recorded during assessment, including a direction to initiate penalty under that provision where deemed satisfaction is invoked. Initiation under section 271AAC, a distinct provision with separate conditions and consequences, cannot support a later notice or penalty under section 271(1)(c). A subsequent penalty order cannot amend the assessment order or retrospectively create foundational jurisdiction. The penalty was therefore deleted, while the quantum appeal remained for independent determination on merits.
Jurisdictional satisfaction for penalty under section 271(1)(c) must be recorded during assessment, including a direction to initiate penalty under that provision where deemed satisfaction is invoked. Initiation under section 271AAC, a distinct provision with separate conditions and consequences, cannot support a later notice or penalty under section 271(1)(c). A subsequent penalty order cannot amend the assessment order or retrospectively create foundational jurisdiction. The penalty was therefore deleted, while the quantum appeal remained for independent determination on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
