<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Jurisdictional satisfaction for concealment penalty cannot be created later by substituting a distinct penal provision after assessment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104586</link>
    <description>Jurisdictional satisfaction for penalty under section 271(1)(c) must be recorded during assessment, including a direction to initiate penalty under that provision where deemed satisfaction is invoked. Initiation under section 271AAC, a distinct provision with separate conditions and consequences, cannot support a later notice or penalty under section 271(1)(c). A subsequent penalty order cannot amend the assessment order or retrospectively create foundational jurisdiction. The penalty was therefore deleted, while the quantum appeal remained for independent determination on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 08:13:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 08:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=928068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Jurisdictional satisfaction for concealment penalty cannot be created later by substituting a distinct penal provision after assessment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104586</link>
      <description>Jurisdictional satisfaction for penalty under section 271(1)(c) must be recorded during assessment, including a direction to initiate penalty under that provision where deemed satisfaction is invoked. Initiation under section 271AAC, a distinct provision with separate conditions and consequences, cannot support a later notice or penalty under section 271(1)(c). A subsequent penalty order cannot amend the assessment order or retrospectively create foundational jurisdiction. The penalty was therefore deleted, while the quantum appeal remained for independent determination on merits.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 08:13:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>