Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Electronic records used to establish clandestine manufacture and clearance require compliance with prescribed statutory conditions, including the requisite certificate; without it, CD data and computer printouts are inadmissible and cannot determine unaccounted production or removals. Duty demands founded on excluded electronic data require fresh quantification solely from independently admissible evidence. Cross-examination of investigation witnesses is not absolute: unretracted statements may be considered where no evidence of coercion or witness-specific prejudice from denial of cross-examination is shown. Such statements, together with invoices, transport, weighment and statutory records, may support independently established transactions, while interest and penalties must be redetermined with any duty liability ultimately found.
Electronic records used to establish clandestine manufacture and clearance require compliance with prescribed statutory conditions, including the requisite certificate; without it, CD data and computer printouts are inadmissible and cannot determine unaccounted production or removals. Duty demands founded on excluded electronic data require fresh quantification solely from independently admissible evidence. Cross-examination of investigation witnesses is not absolute: unretracted statements may be considered where no evidence of coercion or witness-specific prejudice from denial of cross-examination is shown. Such statements, together with invoices, transport, weighment and statutory records, may support independently established transactions, while interest and penalties must be redetermined with any duty liability ultimately found.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.