Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclus...
Appellate enhancement limits protect against new income sources, while documented credits and prior-year investments resist unexplained-income additio...
Section 69 requires material showing that the assessee itself made an investment not recorded in its books. Payments allegedly made towards land before the assessee firm was constituted could not be treated as its unexplained investment where the predecessor entity accepted responsibility and the assessee recorded the corresponding liability on taking over the project. General partner statements could not displace contemporaneous dates, books, and banking records without supporting enquiry or corroborative evidence. Questions concerning the predecessor's source of funds required examination in that entity's assessment. The unexplained-investment addition, consequential tax, and interest were deleted.
Section 69 requires material showing that the assessee itself made an investment not recorded in its books. Payments allegedly made towards land before the assessee firm was constituted could not be treated as its unexplained investment where the predecessor entity accepted responsibility and the assessee recorded the corresponding liability on taking over the project. General partner statements could not displace contemporaneous dates, books, and banking records without supporting enquiry or corroborative evidence. Questions concerning the predecessor's source of funds required examination in that entity's assessment. The unexplained-investment addition, consequential tax, and interest were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.