Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Unexplained investment requires proof that the assessee made an unrecorded investment; predecessor liabilities cannot support addition.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Section 69 requires material showing that the assessee itself made an investment not recorded in its books. Payments allegedly made towards land before the assessee firm was constituted could not be treated as its unexplained investment where the predecessor entity accepted responsibility and the assessee recorded the corresponding liability on taking over the project. General partner statements could not displace contemporaneous dates, books, and banking records without supporting enquiry or corroborative evidence. Questions concerning the predecessor's source of funds required examination in that entity's assessment. The unexplained-investment addition, consequential tax, and interest were deleted.....