E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Parallel Central and State GST proceedings concerning identical issues for the same assessment period require avoidance of duplicate adjudication. Where Central GST authorities issue an earlier adjudication order and an appeal against it remains pending, subsequent State GST assessment and rectification orders addressing the same issues and period cannot be sustained. The overlap between the two proceedings makes the later State GST action duplicative of the prior Central GST adjudication.
Parallel Central and State GST proceedings concerning identical issues for the same assessment period require avoidance of duplicate adjudication. Where Central GST authorities issue an earlier adjudication order and an appeal against it remains pending, subsequent State GST assessment and rectification orders addressing the same issues and period cannot be sustained. The overlap between the two proceedings makes the later State GST action duplicative of the prior Central GST adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
