Permanent establishment tests: independent subsidiary premises and principal-to-principal dealings did not create Indian taxability for offshore suppl...
Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and compa...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 69 applies only to investments not recorded in the assessee's books of account. Immovable properties recorded in the firm's regular books, together with corresponding identifiable partners' capital contributions, cannot be treated as unexplained investments where the books have not been found defective or rejected. Concerns about an individual partner's financial capacity must be examined in that partner's assessment and do not, by themselves, make the firm's recorded investment unexplained. Principles applicable to unexplained cash credits do not govern recorded investments under section 69. The addition for unexplained investment was therefore deleted, while the reassessment challenge was left academic.
Section 69 applies only to investments not recorded in the assessee's books of account. Immovable properties recorded in the firm's regular books, together with corresponding identifiable partners' capital contributions, cannot be treated as unexplained investments where the books have not been found defective or rejected. Concerns about an individual partner's financial capacity must be examined in that partner's assessment and do not, by themselves, make the firm's recorded investment unexplained. Principles applicable to unexplained cash credits do not govern recorded investments under section 69. The addition for unexplained investment was therefore deleted, while the reassessment challenge was left academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.