Permanent-establishment reassessment cannot revisit scrutinised disclosures; extended reopening fails without undisclosed material facts and within st...
Modified returns after business reorganisation must be assessed within pending proceedings, barring parallel scrutiny and consequential transfer prici...
Permissive possession granted to a developer solely to construct flats does not amount to legal possession in part performance of a contract. Such limited entry, unlike possession involving control over property contemplated for part performance, does not constitute a transfer for capital-gains purposes. Accordingly, no long-term capital-gains charge arose from the development agreement, and the related addition was deleted.
Permissive possession granted to a developer solely to construct flats does not amount to legal possession in part performance of a contract. Such limited entry, unlike possession involving control over property contemplated for part performance, does not constitute a transfer for capital-gains purposes. Accordingly, no long-term capital-gains charge arose from the development agreement, and the related addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
