Business expenditure and depreciation rules allow operational outgoings while limiting disallowances for personal elements and unsupported third-party...
Compromise-and-arrangement extensions may accommodate debt assignment where creditor commercial judgment supports value maximisation and avoids proced...
Delayed-payment surcharge is not taxable tolerance consideration where it penalises default, while meter testing follows electricity distribution trea...
Sufficient cause for delayed revenue income-tax appeals requires bona fides, due diligence and a credible explanation; otherwise limitation bars appea...
Page of 4897
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1081 to 1100 of 97923 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Pre-existing dispute over an outcome-based professional fee may...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigation.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Pre-existing dispute over an outcome-based professional fee may prevent Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contemporaneous correspondence shows a substantive contest about contractual success, fee entitlement, and finality of the underlying GST proceedings. Setting aside of the GST order relevant to fee computation, questions about the capacity in which representation was provided, and the enforceability of relief-linked remuneration under the applicable professional framework may require adjudication outside the limited Section 9 process. A bona fide dispute, rather than a patently feeble defence or later-created contention, leaves the contractual claim to other remedies.
Pre-existing dispute over an outcome-based professional fee may prevent Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contemporaneous correspondence shows a substantive contest about contractual success, fee entitlement, and finality of the underlying GST proceedings. Setting aside of the GST order relevant to fee computation, questions about the capacity in which representation was provided, and the enforceability of relief-linked remuneration under the applicable professional framework may require adjudication outside the limited Section 9 process. A bona fide dispute, rather than a patently feeble defence or later-created contention, leaves the contractual claim to other remedies.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.