Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Corresponding scheduled offences preserve money-laundering jurisdiction despite repeal of the central corruption provision where conduct remains cover...
Concurrent anticipatory-bail jurisdiction permits applications before either forum, while secured evidence may negate custodial interrogation in GST e...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Availability of a statutory appeal against rejection of a GST registration-cancellation application does not bar writ jurisdiction under Article 226, but strongly informs its discretionary exercise. Where the challenge requires resolution of disputed facts and appraisal of the record, the statutory Appellate Authority is the appropriate forum. The writ petition was therefore not entertained, with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal; the Appellate Authority must decide it independently of observations made in the writ proceedings.
Availability of a statutory appeal against rejection of a GST registration-cancellation application does not bar writ jurisdiction under Article 226, but strongly informs its discretionary exercise. Where the challenge requires resolution of disputed facts and appraisal of the record, the statutory Appellate Authority is the appropriate forum. The writ petition was therefore not entertained, with liberty to pursue the statutory appeal; the Appellate Authority must decide it independently of observations made in the writ proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
