E-filing system failure permits exclusion of affected time in insolvency appeals, preventing tribunal technology defects from defeating timely filings...
Pre-existing disputes over outcome-based professional fees can bar Section 9 insolvency proceedings where contractual entitlement requires investigati...
Way Leave Permissions cannot be retrospectively revived through insolvency plans, and affected infrastructure holders require safety review and hearin...
Personal guarantor insolvency jurisdiction follows the corporate debtor's CIRP Bench, enabling inter-territorial transfer and preventing parallel proc...
Forensic audit reports are not conclusive proof of fraud, but may support insolvency contribution liability when reliable documentary evidence substantiates their findings. Sale deeds, bank records, sub-registrar records and title-verification material supported findings that property transactions were accommodation arrangements used to raise loans. Loan proceeds substantially returned through sellers to the corporate debtor and related entities, establishing round-tripping intended to defraud creditors. Former management failed to rebut matters within its special knowledge. Ex parte determination remained valid because suspended directors received adequate opportunity to contest the proceedings and did not produce reliable contrary material. The fraudulent-transaction finding and consequential contribution direction were sustained.
Forensic audit reports are not conclusive proof of fraud, but may support insolvency contribution liability when reliable documentary evidence substantiates their findings. Sale deeds, bank records, sub-registrar records and title-verification material supported findings that property transactions were accommodation arrangements used to raise loans. Loan proceeds substantially returned through sellers to the corporate debtor and related entities, establishing round-tripping intended to defraud creditors. Former management failed to rebut matters within its special knowledge. Ex parte determination remained valid because suspended directors received adequate opportunity to contest the proceedings and did not produce reliable contrary material. The fraudulent-transaction finding and consequential contribution direction were sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.