GST payment representations require record-based, reasoned decisions while substantive entitlement remains open for determination by competent authori...
Reassessment sanction under extended limitation required approval from the competent specified authority, invalidating proceedings approved by an inco...
Section 12A withdrawal through settlement is presented as an integral insolvency-resolution exit route, alongside resolution plans and liquidation. Where a viable settlement and repayment process exists, the resolution professional must independently and objectively consider extending CIRP, including use of the period up to the 330-day outer limit where appropriate, rather than prematurely seek liquidation. A resolution professional cannot rely on Registry advice regarding relief or privately consult an individual Committee of Creditors member instead of convening the Committee. Such non-independent decision-making renders a liquidation application under Section 33(1) legally unsustainable. The liquidation order was set aside, and CIRP was restored to explore settlement-based withdrawal.
Section 12A withdrawal through settlement is presented as an integral insolvency-resolution exit route, alongside resolution plans and liquidation. Where a viable settlement and repayment process exists, the resolution professional must independently and objectively consider extending CIRP, including use of the period up to the 330-day outer limit where appropriate, rather than prematurely seek liquidation. A resolution professional cannot rely on Registry advice regarding relief or privately consult an individual Committee of Creditors member instead of convening the Committee. Such non-independent decision-making renders a liquidation application under Section 33(1) legally unsustainable. The liquidation order was set aside, and CIRP was restored to explore settlement-based withdrawal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.