<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 12A settlement may justify CIRP extension and prevent arbitrary liquidation where a viable repayment process continues.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103677</link>
    <description>Section 12A withdrawal through settlement is presented as an integral insolvency-resolution exit route, alongside resolution plans and liquidation. Where a viable settlement and repayment process exists, the resolution professional must independently and objectively consider extending CIRP, including use of the period up to the 330-day outer limit where appropriate, rather than prematurely seek liquidation. A resolution professional cannot rely on Registry advice regarding relief or privately consult an individual Committee of Creditors member instead of convening the Committee. Such non-independent decision-making renders a liquidation application under Section 33(1) legally unsustainable. The liquidation order was set aside, and CIRP was restored to explore settlement-based withdrawal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:41:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=922472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 12A settlement may justify CIRP extension and prevent arbitrary liquidation where a viable repayment process continues.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103677</link>
      <description>Section 12A withdrawal through settlement is presented as an integral insolvency-resolution exit route, alongside resolution plans and liquidation. Where a viable settlement and repayment process exists, the resolution professional must independently and objectively consider extending CIRP, including use of the period up to the 330-day outer limit where appropriate, rather than prematurely seek liquidation. A resolution professional cannot rely on Registry advice regarding relief or privately consult an individual Committee of Creditors member instead of convening the Committee. Such non-independent decision-making renders a liquidation application under Section 33(1) legally unsustainable. The liquidation order was set aside, and CIRP was restored to explore settlement-based withdrawal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 08:41:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>