GST payment representations require record-based, reasoned decisions while substantive entitlement remains open for determination by competent authori...
Reassessment sanction under extended limitation required approval from the competent specified authority, invalidating proceedings approved by an inco...
Internal CUP benchmarking for fixed-rate Masala Bonds prevails over floating external comparables, eliminating the related transfer-pricing adjustment...
Jurisdictional validity of revision notices: incorrect official capacity and mere change of opinion invalidate revision of property income assessments...
Departmental appeal limitation after recall from the call book...
Departmental appeal limitation after call-book recall preserves original filing, while documented correlation supports SAD refund on imported granules.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Departmental appeal limitation after recall from the call book is determined by the original filing date; administrative renumbering does not create a fresh appeal or make it time-barred. For special additional duty refund on imported plastic granules, generic sale-invoice descriptions did not negate correlation where Bills of Entry, sale invoices, reconciliation, VAT/CST payment records and a Chartered Accountant's certificate supported the claim. Sales through consignment agents did not independently justify rejection absent a specific documentary defect. Wikipedia material could not displace contemporaneous import and sale records. The refund sanction was restored, while the departmental appeal failed on merits.
Departmental appeal limitation after recall from the call book is determined by the original filing date; administrative renumbering does not create a fresh appeal or make it time-barred. For special additional duty refund on imported plastic granules, generic sale-invoice descriptions did not negate correlation where Bills of Entry, sale invoices, reconciliation, VAT/CST payment records and a Chartered Accountant's certificate supported the claim. Sales through consignment agents did not independently justify rejection absent a specific documentary defect. Wikipedia material could not displace contemporaneous import and sale records. The refund sanction was restored, while the departmental appeal failed on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.