<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Departmental appeal limitation after call-book recall preserves original filing, while documented correlation supports SAD refund on imported granules.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103614</link>
    <description>Departmental appeal limitation after recall from the call book is determined by the original filing date; administrative renumbering does not create a fresh appeal or make it time-barred. For special additional duty refund on imported plastic granules, generic sale-invoice descriptions did not negate correlation where Bills of Entry, sale invoices, reconciliation, VAT/CST payment records and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate supported the claim. Sales through consignment agents did not independently justify rejection absent a specific documentary defect. Wikipedia material could not displace contemporaneous import and sale records. The refund sanction was restored, while the departmental appeal failed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:51:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:51:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=921841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Departmental appeal limitation after call-book recall preserves original filing, while documented correlation supports SAD refund on imported granules.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103614</link>
      <description>Departmental appeal limitation after recall from the call book is determined by the original filing date; administrative renumbering does not create a fresh appeal or make it time-barred. For special additional duty refund on imported plastic granules, generic sale-invoice descriptions did not negate correlation where Bills of Entry, sale invoices, reconciliation, VAT/CST payment records and a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate supported the claim. Sales through consignment agents did not independently justify rejection absent a specific documentary defect. Wikipedia material could not displace contemporaneous import and sale records. The refund sanction was restored, while the departmental appeal failed on merits.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 08:51:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103614</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>