Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1101 to 1120 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellate authorities must decide an income-tax appeal on its merits where it has not been withdrawn, notwithstanding the assessee's non-prosecution or failure to make further compliance. Dismissal without examining grounds challenging reassessment and additions for unexplained bank credits fails to discharge the appellate duty to adjudicate the issues raised. Challenges concerning audited books, business history and bank withdrawals require consideration after providing an opportunity to substantiate the contentions and produce supporting material. The appeal was restored for fresh appellate adjudication in accordance with law.
Appellate authorities must decide an income-tax appeal on its merits where it has not been withdrawn, notwithstanding the assessee's non-prosecution or failure to make further compliance. Dismissal without examining grounds challenging reassessment and additions for unexplained bank credits fails to discharge the appellate duty to adjudicate the issues raised. Challenges concerning audited books, business history and bank withdrawals require consideration after providing an opportunity to substantiate the contentions and produce supporting material. The appeal was restored for fresh appellate adjudication in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.