Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Page of 4883
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1101 to 1120 of 97649 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Independent satisfaction of the Assessing Officer is required before reassessment can be initiated; a Board instruction cannot substitute for a reasoned belief that income escaped assessment. Where interest income was disclosed in a return, even if the return was treated as invalid, and no material shows that related expenses were wrongly claimed or disallowable, the available material may justify examination of net profit only. It does not support treating the entire interest income as escaped. Reassessment reasons reflecting only perfunctory compliance with directions therefore lack the required basis, rendering the notice and consequential assessment invalid.
Independent satisfaction of the Assessing Officer is required before reassessment can be initiated; a Board instruction cannot substitute for a reasoned belief that income escaped assessment. Where interest income was disclosed in a return, even if the return was treated as invalid, and no material shows that related expenses were wrongly claimed or disallowable, the available material may justify examination of net profit only. It does not support treating the entire interest income as escaped. Reassessment reasons reflecting only perfunctory compliance with directions therefore lack the required basis, rendering the notice and consequential assessment invalid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.