Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Page of 4886
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1281 to 1300 of 97710 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Forfeiture of a successful bidder's part payment before expiry of an expressly extended period for paying the auction balance is arbitrary. A payment communication allowing payment beyond the original deadline with interest for up to 60 days made forfeiture operative only upon default continuing after that period. Discretion under the payment schedule to extend the timeline and the regulatory framework for delayed payment with interest did not permit earlier cancellation or forfeiture. Where the asset was subsequently sold and consideration realised, retention of the part payment was unjustified. The forfeiture was set aside to the extent of refunding the part payment without interest.
Forfeiture of a successful bidder's part payment before expiry of an expressly extended period for paying the auction balance is arbitrary. A payment communication allowing payment beyond the original deadline with interest for up to 60 days made forfeiture operative only upon default continuing after that period. Discretion under the payment schedule to extend the timeline and the regulatory framework for delayed payment with interest did not permit earlier cancellation or forfeiture. Where the asset was subsequently sold and consideration realised, retention of the part payment was unjustified. The forfeiture was set aside to the extent of refunding the part payment without interest.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4886 
