<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Forfeiture of an auction deposit before an extended payment period expires is arbitrary and requires refund without interest.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103260</link>
    <description>Forfeiture of a successful bidder&#039;s part payment before expiry of an expressly extended period for paying the auction balance is arbitrary. A payment communication allowing payment beyond the original deadline with interest for up to 60 days made forfeiture operative only upon default continuing after that period. Discretion under the payment schedule to extend the timeline and the regulatory framework for delayed payment with interest did not permit earlier cancellation or forfeiture. Where the asset was subsequently sold and consideration realised, retention of the part payment was unjustified. The forfeiture was set aside to the extent of refunding the part payment without interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:22 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=919981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Forfeiture of an auction deposit before an extended payment period expires is arbitrary and requires refund without interest.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103260</link>
      <description>Forfeiture of a successful bidder&#039;s part payment before expiry of an expressly extended period for paying the auction balance is arbitrary. A payment communication allowing payment beyond the original deadline with interest for up to 60 days made forfeiture operative only upon default continuing after that period. Discretion under the payment schedule to extend the timeline and the regulatory framework for delayed payment with interest did not permit earlier cancellation or forfeiture. Where the asset was subsequently sold and consideration realised, retention of the part payment was unjustified. The forfeiture was set aside to the extent of refunding the part payment without interest.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 08:26:22 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>