Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Regulation 31A authorises a regulatory fee on resolution plans as part of insolvency resolution process costs. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board's powers to levy fees and make regulations extend across the corporate insolvency resolution process and are not confined to service-provider registration or renewal. The residuary category of process costs may include the fee because the listed costs share no common genus limiting that power. The levy is a regulatory fee, not a tax: a broad nexus with regulatory services is sufficient and exact quid pro quo is unnecessary. It is neither arbitrary nor excessive merely because the regulator generates a surplus. The proviso applies prospectively to resolution plans pending adjudicatory approval and does not impose retrospective liability.
Regulation 31A authorises a regulatory fee on resolution plans as part of insolvency resolution process costs. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board's powers to levy fees and make regulations extend across the corporate insolvency resolution process and are not confined to service-provider registration or renewal. The residuary category of process costs may include the fee because the listed costs share no common genus limiting that power. The levy is a regulatory fee, not a tax: a broad nexus with regulatory services is sufficient and exact quid pro quo is unnecessary. It is neither arbitrary nor excessive merely because the regulator generates a surplus. The proviso applies prospectively to resolution plans pending adjudicatory approval and does not impose retrospective liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
