Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vac...
Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory complianc...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal jurisdiction to convene a requisitioned extraordinary general meeting is not conditional on the requisitioning member first using its statutory power to call the meeting after Board default; those remedies operate independently. However, intervention in corporate internal management remains exceptional and requires a reasonable factual basis showing that convening the meeting through ordinary statutory or articles-based mechanisms is impracticable. Board division or rejection of a requisition alone does not establish impracticability. Where the requisitioning member neither demonstrates difficulty in convening shareholders nor uses the available statutory mechanism, a direction to convene the meeting lacks the required factual basis and should be set aside.
Tribunal jurisdiction to convene a requisitioned extraordinary general meeting is not conditional on the requisitioning member first using its statutory power to call the meeting after Board default; those remedies operate independently. However, intervention in corporate internal management remains exceptional and requires a reasonable factual basis showing that convening the meeting through ordinary statutory or articles-based mechanisms is impracticable. Board division or rejection of a requisition alone does not establish impracticability. Where the requisitioning member neither demonstrates difficulty in convening shareholders nor uses the available statutory mechanism, a direction to convene the meeting lacks the required factual basis and should be set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.