<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal intervention in requisitioned meetings requires proven impracticability, despite independent statutory remedies for members to convene them.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102818</link>
    <description>Tribunal jurisdiction to convene a requisitioned extraordinary general meeting is not conditional on the requisitioning member first using its statutory power to call the meeting after Board default; those remedies operate independently. However, intervention in corporate internal management remains exceptional and requires a reasonable factual basis showing that convening the meeting through ordinary statutory or articles-based mechanisms is impracticable. Board division or rejection of a requisition alone does not establish impracticability. Where the requisitioning member neither demonstrates difficulty in convening shareholders nor uses the available statutory mechanism, a direction to convene the meeting lacks the required factual basis and should be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:11 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=917683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal intervention in requisitioned meetings requires proven impracticability, despite independent statutory remedies for members to convene them.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102818</link>
      <description>Tribunal jurisdiction to convene a requisitioned extraordinary general meeting is not conditional on the requisitioning member first using its statutory power to call the meeting after Board default; those remedies operate independently. However, intervention in corporate internal management remains exceptional and requires a reasonable factual basis showing that convening the meeting through ordinary statutory or articles-based mechanisms is impracticable. Board division or rejection of a requisition alone does not establish impracticability. Where the requisitioning member neither demonstrates difficulty in convening shareholders nor uses the available statutory mechanism, a direction to convene the meeting lacks the required factual basis and should be set aside.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:20:11 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>