Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
GST adjudication orders should ordinarily be challenged through the statutory appellate remedy where the taxpayer participated in proceedings and filed a detailed reply. Allegations concerning inadequate reasoning, service defects without demonstrated prejudice, electronic evidence, cross-examination, and overlap with an earlier statutory audit involve disputed facts and evidentiary assessment suitable for appellate examination. Writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily exercised unless a recognised exceptional ground, including a genuine breach of natural justice, is established. The writ petition was dismissed while preserving factual and legal contentions for appeal, and the writ-pendency period was excluded from limitation if an appeal is filed.
GST adjudication orders should ordinarily be challenged through the statutory appellate remedy where the taxpayer participated in proceedings and filed a detailed reply. Allegations concerning inadequate reasoning, service defects without demonstrated prejudice, electronic evidence, cross-examination, and overlap with an earlier statutory audit involve disputed facts and evidentiary assessment suitable for appellate examination. Writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily exercised unless a recognised exceptional ground, including a genuine breach of natural justice, is established. The writ petition was dismissed while preserving factual and legal contentions for appeal, and the writ-pendency period was excluded from limitation if an appeal is filed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
