https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102556 GST adjudication orders should ordinarily be challenged through the statutory appellate remedy where the taxpayer participated in proceedings and filed a detailed reply. Allegations concerning inadequate reasoning, service defects without demonstrated prejudice, electronic evidence, cross-examination, and overlap with an earlier statutory audit involve disputed facts and evidentiary assessment suitable for appellate examination. Writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily exercised unless a recognised exceptional ground, including a genuine breach of natural justice, is established. The writ petition was dismissed while preserving factual and legal contentions for appeal, and the writ-pendency period was excluded from limitation if an appeal is filed. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:15:35 +0530 Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:15:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102556 GST adjudication orders should ordinarily be challenged through the statutory appellate remedy where the taxpayer participated in proceedings and filed a detailed reply. Allegations concerning inadequate reasoning, service defects without demonstrated prejudice, electronic evidence, cross-examination, and overlap with an earlier statutory audit involve disputed facts and evidentiary assessment suitable for appellate examination. Writ jurisdiction is not ordinarily exercised unless a recognised exceptional ground, including a genuine breach of natural justice, is established. The writ petition was dismissed while preserving factual and legal contentions for appeal, and the writ-pendency period was excluded from limitation if an appeal is filed. Highlights GST Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:15:35 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=102556