Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Rule 86A does not permit negative blocking of input tax credit in the electronic credit ledger by restricting credits that may arise in the future. The High Court notes that, following Rawman Metal & Alloys and subsequent consistent decisions, blocking may not exceed credit available in the ledger even where wrongful or fraudulent availment from non-genuine or non-existent suppliers is alleged. Orders producing negative blocking were quashed, while preserving the respondent's ability to take further action permitted by law, including restoring blocked credit where legally permissible.
Rule 86A does not permit negative blocking of input tax credit in the electronic credit ledger by restricting credits that may arise in the future. The High Court notes that, following Rawman Metal & Alloys and subsequent consistent decisions, blocking may not exceed credit available in the ledger even where wrongful or fraudulent availment from non-genuine or non-existent suppliers is alleged. Orders producing negative blocking were quashed, while preserving the respondent's ability to take further action permitted by law, including restoring blocked credit where legally permissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.