Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
A refund determined for one assessment year cannot be adjusted under Section 245 against a tax demand covered by a subsisting, unchallenged interim stay order. The stay for assessment year 2022-23 was conditional on specified instalment deposits, had not been challenged or displaced by the Revenue, and was uploaded on the ITBA Portal by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Adjustment of the refund against that stayed demand therefore contravened the operative stay order. The High Court quashed the adjustment and directed restoration of the refund with applicable interest in accordance with law.
A refund determined for one assessment year cannot be adjusted under Section 245 against a tax demand covered by a subsisting, unchallenged interim stay order. The stay for assessment year 2022-23 was conditional on specified instalment deposits, had not been challenged or displaced by the Revenue, and was uploaded on the ITBA Portal by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. Adjustment of the refund against that stayed demand therefore contravened the operative stay order. The High Court quashed the adjustment and directed restoration of the refund with applicable interest in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
