Specialised ophthalmic instruments are classified by their...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, and penalties
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Specialised ophthalmic instruments are classified by their primary use and essential character, with HSN Explanatory Notes guiding the distinction between specific and general tariff headings. The notes state that operation microscopes designed for ophthalmic surgery fall under Heading 9018 despite possible wider use, while lensmeters and chart projectors also fall under Heading 9018 as specialised ophthalmic devices. They further explain that extended limitation requires proof of wilful misstatement, suppression, collusion, or intent to evade duty. Consistent declarations, supporting technical literature, and Customs examination were treated as inconsistent with suppression. Misclassification alone was not treated as misdeclaration or sufficient mens rea for confiscation and penalty; the demand, confiscation, redemption fine, and penalty were described as set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.