Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Foreign tax credit could not be denied merely because Form No. 67 was filed after the return due date, as the ITAT treated the filing requirement as directory rather than mandatory. Where the form's contents and the underlying foreign tax credit claim were otherwise not defective, delay in filing alone did not justify rejection of the substantive benefit. The order sustaining denial was set aside and the Assessing Officer was directed to examine the facts and allow the claim in accordance with Form No. 67.
Foreign tax credit could not be denied merely because Form No. 67 was filed after the return due date, as the ITAT treated the filing requirement as directory rather than mandatory. Where the form's contents and the underlying foreign tax credit claim were otherwise not defective, delay in filing alone did not justify rejection of the substantive benefit. The order sustaining denial was set aside and the Assessing Officer was directed to examine the facts and allow the claim in accordance with Form No. 67.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.