Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Deduction under section 54F was held allowable despite non-deposit of the unutilized capital gains in the Capital Gains Account Scheme before the return due date, because the assessee had actually invested the amount in purchase or construction of a residential house within the time permitted under section 54F(1). The Tribunal held that section 54F(4) applies where the assessee seeks to retain the unutilized amount while claiming exemption; it does not by itself defeat relief when the investment condition is otherwise satisfied. The disallowance was reversed and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction.
Deduction under section 54F was held allowable despite non-deposit of the unutilized capital gains in the Capital Gains Account Scheme before the return due date, because the assessee had actually invested the amount in purchase or construction of a residential house within the time permitted under section 54F(1). The Tribunal held that section 54F(4) applies where the assessee seeks to retain the unutilized amount while claiming exemption; it does not by itself defeat relief when the investment condition is otherwise satisfied. The disallowance was reversed and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
