Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Receipt of premium before the accident was treated as the point at which risk attached under motor insurance, even though the policy document showed a later commencement date. Because the insurer did not examine the agent said to have handled the transaction, the court drew an adverse inference against the insurer. On the evidence of the premium transfer, the court held that the insurer could not avoid liability by relying only on the later policy date and had to satisfy the award.
Receipt of premium before the accident was treated as the point at which risk attached under motor insurance, even though the policy document showed a later commencement date. Because the insurer did not examine the agent said to have handled the transaction, the court drew an adverse inference against the insurer. On the evidence of the premium transfer, the court held that the insurer could not avoid liability by relying only on the later policy date and had to satisfy the award.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.