Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The Tribunal held that the extended reassessment period beyond three years was unavailable because the alleged escaped income related only to a claimed donation deduction and did not meet the statutory monetary threshold for extension. It further found that, even after excluding the time allowed to respond to the section 148A(b) notice, the Assessing Officer had time only until 07/04/2023 to issue the reassessment notice, but it was issued on 10/04/2023. The sixth proviso was therefore inapplicable, and the reassessment notice was time-barred and invalid; the merits of the disallowance were left open.
The Tribunal held that the extended reassessment period beyond three years was unavailable because the alleged escaped income related only to a claimed donation deduction and did not meet the statutory monetary threshold for extension. It further found that, even after excluding the time allowed to respond to the section 148A(b) notice, the Assessing Officer had time only until 07/04/2023 to issue the reassessment notice, but it was issued on 10/04/2023. The sixth proviso was therefore inapplicable, and the reassessment notice was time-barred and invalid; the merits of the disallowance were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
