Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Customs field formations are directed not to seek direct clarification from DGFT Headquarters or Regional Authorities on interpretation of FTP provisions or policy conditions. Such issues must first be examined at Commissionerate/Zonal level, and only policy-level matters after due examination may be referred to the Board by the concerned Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner; commodity-specific issues require prior examination and approval by the concerned National Assessment Centre. Every reference must include concise facts, the provision in question, the field interpretation, the specific point needing clarification, the number of affected cases, whether live consignments are pending, and urgency status. Pending consignments should not be kept on hold solely for interpretational issues, and provisional assessment or other facilitative mechanisms may be used where legally permissible.
Customs field formations are directed not to seek direct clarification from DGFT Headquarters or Regional Authorities on interpretation of FTP provisions or policy conditions. Such issues must first be examined at Commissionerate/Zonal level, and only policy-level matters after due examination may be referred to the Board by the concerned Principal Chief Commissioner/Chief Commissioner; commodity-specific issues require prior examination and approval by the concerned National Assessment Centre. Every reference must include concise facts, the provision in question, the field interpretation, the specific point needing clarification, the number of affected cases, whether live consignments are pending, and urgency status. Pending consignments should not be kept on hold solely for interpretational issues, and provisional assessment or other facilitative mechanisms may be used where legally permissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.