Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Deduction under section 57(iii) is available only where the expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively for earning the relevant income and where a direct and proximate nexus exists between the borrowing and the interest income. On the facts, the assessee failed to prove that link; the record showed use of borrowed funds for share investment and purchase of plots and residential property, and a bare assertion of intent to earn income was insufficient without supporting evidence. The earlier year was distinguishable because direct nexus had then been established. The disallowance of the interest expenditure was therefore upheld.
Deduction under section 57(iii) is available only where the expenditure is incurred wholly and exclusively for earning the relevant income and where a direct and proximate nexus exists between the borrowing and the interest income. On the facts, the assessee failed to prove that link; the record showed use of borrowed funds for share investment and purchase of plots and residential property, and a bare assertion of intent to earn income was insufficient without supporting evidence. The earlier year was distinguishable because direct nexus had then been established. The disallowance of the interest expenditure was therefore upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
