1. My conclusion
| Particular | Treatment |
| Main business turnover | Rs. 1.82 crore |
| Main business | 44AD |
| Digital receipts | 6% presumptive rate, subject to conditions |
| Presumptive income | Rs. 10.92 lakh, if entire Rs. 1.82 cr qualifies for 6% |
| F&O turnover | Rs. 1.42 lakh if correctly computed as tax-audit turnover |
| F&O result | Actual loss Rs. 19,500 |
| F&O treatment | Normal business |
| ITR | ITR-3 |
| Tax audit merely because of F&O loss | No |
| Tax audit because F&O turnover is Rs. 1.42 lakh | No |
One qualification I would specifically document
I would not simply rely on the broker's Rs. 1.42 lakh figure. First recompute F&O turnover as per the ICAI Guidance Note. A broker's "turnover"/P&L figure and section 44AB turnover are not necessarily identical.
Also verify that the Rs. 1.82 crore business is genuinely an eligible 44AD business, that the assessee is eligible for 44AD, and that the cash-receipt condition for the Rs. 3 crore limit and 6% treatment is satisfied.
There is also a recent Jaipur ITAT decision concerning F&O losses and the interaction of sections 44AD/44AB, so I would keep that jurisprudence in the file rather than treating the issue as completely risk-free.