1. On the facts stated, the activity should ordinarily be treated as business income and not capital gains.
The client is purchasing vacant sites, constructing residential houses on those sites and thereafter selling and registering the completed houses in favour of customers. The nature and sequence of transactions indicate that the properties are acquired and developed with the intention of sale in the ordinary course of business. Accordingly, the land and constructed houses would generally constitute stock-in-trade/business inventory, and the resulting profit would be taxable under "Profits and Gains of Business or Profession."
The fact that the vacant sites and subsequently constructed houses were registered in the client's own name does not by itself convert them into capital assets. The relevant consideration is the intention and character of holding and the overall nature of the activity.
Therefore, the Rs. 1.50 crore approximately received from sale of the five houses should, prima facie, be considered business turnover, rather than sale consideration giving rise to capital gains.
Section 44AD
If the client is an eligible assessee and the activity satisfies the conditions of section 44AD, the presumptive taxation provisions of section 44AD may be considered. There is no general exclusion merely because the business involves construction and sale of residential houses.
However, before adopting section 44AD, the following should be verified:
-
Constitution and residential status of the assessee;
-
Exact nature of the construction/development activity;
-
Whether the sites were acquired with the intention of resale;
-
Whether similar activity has been carried on regularly;
-
Treatment of land/houses in the books as stock-in-trade or investment; and
-
Cash and non-cash receipt details for determining the applicable turnover limit.
The GST turnover supports the factual position that the client is carrying on a business, but GST treatment by itself does not determine the head of income under the Income-tax Act.
Preliminary view: Strong - Business income; section 44AD can be considered subject to eligibility. Capital-gain treatment would generally not be appropriate on the facts stated.