Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 118048
Like 0 Bookmark

Detention of goods due to non generation of E-invoice

Date 13 Jul 2022
Replies 4 Replies
Views 7418 Views
Asked by
E invoice non generation may not indicate tax evasion; goods detention can be contested for release without penalty.
Detention for non generation of an e invoice arises where Rule 48(4) requirements were not met at interception, but if a compliant invoice is issued immediately thereafter the key contestable issue is absence of intent to evade tax. The argument for release without penalty rests on treating the failure as a procedural lapse, the mechanical nature of invoicing provisions, prompt rectification by issuing the invoice, and reliance on judicial decisions declining penalties in similar circumstances. (AI Summary)

In our case, goods are transported against the tax invoice and e-way bill. However, such an invoice is not raised in accordance with Rule 48(4) on the date of interception. But immediately a day after the issuance of the detention & Seizure order, an e-invoice was raised properly. so, in this case, what will be the grounds one could take for the release of goods without payment of penalty under section 129?

Thanks in Advance.

4 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues