<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Detention of goods due to non generation of E-invoice</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118048</link>
    <description>Detention for non generation of an e invoice arises where Rule 48(4) requirements were not met at interception, but if a compliant invoice is issued immediately thereafter the key contestable issue is absence of intent to evade tax. The argument for release without penalty rests on treating the failure as a procedural lapse, the mechanical nature of invoicing provisions, prompt rectification by issuing the invoice, and reliance on judicial decisions declining penalties in similar circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 23:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=684962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Detention of goods due to non generation of E-invoice</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118048</link>
      <description>Detention for non generation of an e invoice arises where Rule 48(4) requirements were not met at interception, but if a compliant invoice is issued immediately thereafter the key contestable issue is absence of intent to evade tax. The argument for release without penalty rests on treating the failure as a procedural lapse, the mechanical nature of invoicing provisions, prompt rectification by issuing the invoice, and reliance on judicial decisions declining penalties in similar circumstances.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 23:47:59 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>