Instructions to department officials to do necessary due diligence and caution while granting authorization for filing of appeals - To ensure optimal utilisation of available resources to obtain maximum benefit out of litigation.
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Due diligence in filing appeals: ensure careful authorization to avoid adverse judicial criticism and wasted departmental resources. Departmental officials are instructed to exercise due diligence and caution in authorising appeals, ensuring appeals are filed on merits and not in a routine manner. The circular highlights examples of mechanical filings, failure to explain challenging later orders after accepting earlier ones, disregard of higher authority decisions, and prolonged procedural neglect causing dismissal of appeals. It requires timely follow up, accountability for inaction, and that limited resources be deployed only for litigation that promises tangible benefit.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Due diligence in filing appeals: ensure careful authorization to avoid adverse judicial criticism and wasted departmental resources.
Departmental officials are instructed to exercise due diligence and caution in authorising appeals, ensuring appeals are filed on merits and not in a routine manner. The circular highlights examples of mechanical filings, failure to explain challenging later orders after accepting earlier ones, disregard of higher authority decisions, and prolonged procedural neglect causing dismissal of appeals. It requires timely follow up, accountability for inaction, and that limited resources be deployed only for litigation that promises tangible benefit.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.