<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Instructions to department officials to do necessary due diligence and caution while granting authorization for filing of appeals - To ensure optimal utilisation of available resources to obtain maximum benefit out of litigation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=53762</link>
    <description>Departmental officials are instructed to exercise due diligence and caution in authorising appeals, ensuring appeals are filed on merits and not in a routine manner. The circular highlights examples of mechanical filings, failure to explain challenging later orders after accepting earlier ones, disregard of higher authority decisions, and prolonged procedural neglect causing dismissal of appeals. It requires timely follow up, accountability for inaction, and that limited resources be deployed only for litigation that promises tangible benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=389802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Instructions to department officials to do necessary due diligence and caution while granting authorization for filing of appeals - To ensure optimal utilisation of available resources to obtain maximum benefit out of litigation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=53762</link>
      <description>Departmental officials are instructed to exercise due diligence and caution in authorising appeals, ensuring appeals are filed on merits and not in a routine manner. The circular highlights examples of mechanical filings, failure to explain challenging later orders after accepting earlier ones, disregard of higher authority decisions, and prolonged procedural neglect causing dismissal of appeals. It requires timely follow up, accountability for inaction, and that limited resources be deployed only for litigation that promises tangible benefit.</description>
      <category>Circulars</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=53762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>