Excisability of press-mud found unsupported by marketability evidence, prompting departmental acceptance of non-excisable status and instructions. The Supreme Court held that press-mud arising during sugar manufacture is not excisable because the Department failed to produce evidence of marketability. The Department has accepted that verdict and instructed Commissioners to decide pending cases accordingly, having earlier directed issuance of protective demands pending final adjudication.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Excisability of press-mud found unsupported by marketability evidence, prompting departmental acceptance of non-excisable status and instructions.
The Supreme Court held that press-mud arising during sugar manufacture is not excisable because the Department failed to produce evidence of marketability. The Department has accepted that verdict and instructed Commissioners to decide pending cases accordingly, having earlier directed issuance of protective demands pending final adjudication.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.