https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=493 The Supreme Court held that press-mud arising during sugar manufacture is not excisable because the Department failed to produce evidence of marketability. The Department has accepted that verdict and instructed Commissioners to decide pending cases accordingly, having earlier directed issuance of protective demands pending final adjudication. en-us Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=493 The Supreme Court held that press-mud arising during sugar manufacture is not excisable because the Department failed to produce evidence of marketability. The Department has accepted that verdict and instructed Commissioners to decide pending cases accordingly, having earlier directed issuance of protective demands pending final adjudication. Circulars Central Excise Thu, 31 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/circulars?id=493