Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Quantum of personal penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: The duty demand had already been accepted and paid immediately. The appellants' prompt payment and the surrounding circumstances were treated as mitigating factors in fixing the penalty. The availability of Modvat credit on inputs was also noted as a relevant consideration while assessing the proper quantum of penalty.
Conclusion: The personal penalty was reduced from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 2,000, while the confirmed duty demand was left undisturbed.
Final Conclusion: Relief was granted only on the penalty component and the demand itself remained intact.
Ratio Decidendi: Prompt payment of duty and other mitigating circumstances may justify substantial reduction of personal penalty under the central excise penalty provision.