<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 888 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99730</link>
    <description>Prompt payment of the duty demand and the surrounding mitigating circumstances were treated as relevant factors in fixing the quantum of personal penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The availability of Modvat credit on inputs was also considered in assessing the proper penalty. On that basis, the personal penalty was substantially reduced, while the confirmed duty demand remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:01:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=136782" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 888 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99730</link>
      <description>Prompt payment of the duty demand and the surrounding mitigating circumstances were treated as relevant factors in fixing the quantum of personal penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The availability of Modvat credit on inputs was also considered in assessing the proper penalty. On that basis, the personal penalty was substantially reduced, while the confirmed duty demand remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=99730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>