Reasoned appellate orders must consider both sides; omission of assessee submissions justified remand for fresh decision.

An appellate order that addresses only the department's case and omits consideration of the assessee's submissions is not a proper reasoned decision. Where material contentions are ignored and the order does not show application of mind, it cannot be sustained. The appropriate course is to set aside such an order and remand the matter for a fresh speaking order after hearing both sides. The impugned appellate order was therefore set aside and the dispute was sent back for fresh adjudication on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) was vitiated for not considering the assessee's submissions and therefore required to be set aside and remanded for fresh decision.

Analysis: The appellate order dealt only with the department's stand and did not show consideration of the assessee's case. An order that ignores material submissions and does not reflect application of mind cannot be sustained as a proper reasoned decision. In such circumstances, the appropriate course is to set aside the order and send the matter back for a fresh speaking order after hearing both sides.

Conclusion: The impugned appellate order was set aside and the matter was remanded for a detailed speaking order after considering the submissions of both sides.

Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained relief by way of remand, and the dispute was left open for fresh adjudication on merits.

---